ewj
Full Members-
Posts
301 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ewj
-
Yeh, I'm a passive trump lead as well. Ace of spades could have been right to give a ruff but if that's the case I stand a chance of two tricks there, with my DQ and ♥ not breaking.
-
Sorry bluecalm, I was being an idiot. Ignore my easy safety play claims...I feel like Fermat But what you say makes sense
-
I would duck. There's a chance partner has another ♣ and if he doesn't there's a reasonable chance we couldn't beat it anyway or that being active and switching to a ♥ gives the contract.
-
Must admit I would bid 3♦ on the first, and 2♣ then 2♠ on the second...
-
Tbh, it's obvious how you can make the rest and obvious how you can safety play it. Up to you at the table how much you trust clubs to be breaking. I can't tell that sitting here knowing that your opponents are middling-good. My instinct would just to be assume they'd messed up but obviously could be right to safety play it. I mean maybe RHO has a stiff trump so doesn't even consider that you are running the rest, so I guess I would do what Fluffy did.
-
I'm definitely not doubling. RHO is presumably 5-5, 4S or pass for me and I probably pass. Wish I'd shown some values previously...
-
Double...are all these problems love all?
-
2♣ normal on the hand given. Tbh, I would hope that my partner would bid 3♥ if he had 5...I mean I have shown real ♥, I don't class my double as penalties and it's MPs so I'm definitely not passing.
-
Tricky hand I guess. At IMPs I would bid stayman and then 3NT. I guess I could bid 3C, natural and invitational and give up on hearts. Yeh, let's go for that.
-
This is MPs again I assume? No, this hasn't really gone according to plan :(. I double tbh, partner doesn't have to pass...rate to beat it.
-
yeh I pass too
-
Tbh I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility that declarer thought 4♥ denied a ♦ control, and hence 4♠ showed one...so it's possible partner has the ♦K
-
Think I would have played a ♦ back to be honest...not a very convincing auction...declarer might have a ruffing ♣ finesse to take, or a ♠ finesse so not going to harm his entries... Would definitely have doubled rather than second-guessing and hoping that partner leads the right thing. Maybe it's quite sensible not to...but if I was on lead I wouldn't be thinking that smartly and just led the suit you didn't double :P.
-
Pass!!!!! I have 5 trumps for crying out loud. Partner might even have one....not close either.
-
Well given I have a stiff spade, I am expecting 22(54) or 2155 or so. Between 4 and 5♦. Opps haven't bid overly agressively which suggests things might be breaking for us. Stick me down for 5♦ at teams, might be right at pairs as well...yeh go on, I'll bid it at mps as well.
-
Yeh west has a clear double of 2♥ and if North still bid 3♥ (which they genuinely might not), I suppose East could double that...might be resulting though...but surely that seems reasonable, extras, not masses of defence but if partner passes, how bad can it be.
-
Well I thought this looked pretty easy and thought, ace of spades + 4 rounds of clubs d finesse, then a low heart and RHO is endplayed but I suppose they can just play a diamond and you only have 11 tricks. But you can just cash one club, ace of spades, then play a low heart? Now if East plays a diamond you still have your club entry and easily have 12 tricks. And anything else would give you an extra entry to dummy anyway so I suppose that is it, right?
-
2♠ as constructive NF is fine. Not necessarily looking to improve the part score but merely happy to play higher with a fit. Obviously if you have Qx support and a maximum in terms of HCP, you have to raise to at least 3S. But obviously south should have bid 3S...
-
Hi I have heard about a bridge festival in the Azores from 1-5 October, or something along those lines....does anyone have any info / know anything about it? Or have a link to where I might find more information? Thanks, Ed
-
Hi My partner and I are playing transfer responses to 1♣, and playing 1m-1M-2NT as these 6/3 or 5/4 hands with support for responder's major. But we have some pretty rubbish continuations....does anyone know of any nice ones? Thanks, ewj
-
well this thread is the same hand as http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?showtopic=40146 we should probably have lost the match as the other table bid 3♦ on the responding hand but for some reason the opener merely bid 5♦... feels like transfers after michaels are quite a nice idea
-
well this thread is the same hand as http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?showtopic=40146 we should probably have lost the match as the other table bid 3♦ on the responding hand but for some reason the opener merely bid 5♦... feels like transfers after michaels are quite a nice idea
-
[hv=d=e&v=n&s=satxhakqtxdkxxxcx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv] 1♥ from you in 2nd seat, 2♥ (spades and another) on your left and RHO bids 4♠....your go
-
Ok, suppose LHO now bids 4♠ and it comes back to you...you pass this out presumably?
