Jurek S
-
Posts
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Jurek S's Achievements
(2/13)
0
Reputation
-
Yes, someone told m long ago to play the hand with 11 cards in 2 suits, Bd 4♠
-
Pass, not really clear-cut but I don't use "super acceptance" response on transfer.
-
-
4♠ and prepared to be -1 B)
-
You can't say "sorry gtg" or anything like that. You have ♠xx, ♥AKTx, ♦AJ9x, ♣Jxx Bidding: 1♦(by you) - 2♣ - 2♠ - pass ? B) Please, do not try to covince me to 4 card major or weak NT.
-
opinions on 1nt bid
Jurek S replied to sceptic's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
Once you prefered 1♣ over 1♦ 1NT is clear. 2♥ by N is crazy. -
2♣, not even close. Would you really pass after 1NT - pass - pass - dbl ?
-
That's why post-mortem is so important :( , How can I have 4 tricks in ♣ and ♠ with maximum of 9-10 HP, look at your KQJ in ♦, you know about my ♥ shortness. So it was a "do something" double partner :rolleyes:
-
Double! Let your partner go wrong. It sould promiss 2-2,5 def trick outside ♦ so he will pass with 1,75 like ♦A and ♥J9xx, othewise he'll bid 5♦. And, after you can always "adjust" your post-mortem.
-
I'm 5♦ bidder. Partner won't bid 6♦ without 4 or 3+ ruffing value in major and we can even find 6♣ - this is for 1st part, After Stayman - pass
-
1NT, but only cos of ♣98 and after 3min. hesitation .... Oh, well after 1min more 1♣ and 1NT
-
♦Q for now. Partner has 3 - 6/7 HP i'd like to discover where they are. Imagine you take ♦ and play ♥ - decl wins ♥ 9 and play ♠ - would you play ♠A ? If not - your partner has KTxx in ♦, if yes Jxxx.
-
Didn't notice 14-16 NT, drop all Ts from my previoust post. Strongly disagree with 3♥ bid. Why not 2NT ? or even 3NT io 4♦ ? He should know that ♦ AK is wrong for slam.
-
I bid 6♥ now, might of course bid BW before but the worst he can have is ATx,AQx,KTx,JT9x, i'd also bid 2♣ not 2♦
-
what do you think of this bidding?
Jurek S replied to sceptic's topic in Intermediate and Advanced Bridge Discussion
Congratulations for the hunter, sometime it's just happend to me