jnetp

I submitted this earlier but lost it, so it may be a duplication. I do not like the new system. I liked "Friend" because (to me) it meant someone I would like to partner with. It didn't matter to me whether or not the person had "friended" me as well, so the Friend/Follow division in the "who's online" list could be eliminated. Also: On the profiles I would prefer "Friend" to "Follow." Neutral is fine. "Ignore," however, doesn't do the trick. What we need in that space is the opportunity to indicate that we do not wish to partner with that person again. I don't see the need to indicate that we don't want chats from the person; however, there are many reasons why I would like for bbo to prevent my being assigned to partner again with a person with whom I do not have a good fit. The term "Enemy" is too strong, as my p and I may get along beautifully but just have a terrible mis-fit with respect to our bidding and play. Perhaps changing Enemy to another term---e.g., mismatch, negative, no play, . . . (I don't like any of those, but you get the idea) would work---as long as bbo blocks that match for the future. Thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback!