surelyours

问题提得颇具暗示性，我觉得应该用反明手的思路。 一方面，如果考虑防止D丢两墩的话，就尽量放将牌的失墩给西家。 另一方面，对这种将牌结构我喜欢先出A再向明手回小。 具体这副牌怎么做？我还没想清楚。嘿嘿

A very typical instance showing robot has no idea of which is its goal between tricks and scores.

Another instance showing robot would rather pursue more tricks than positive scores. Haven't they been set priorities among these factors？

Yes! I pay more time on mouse moving than clicking cards! lol

Thank you very much,Senior player. I learned some valuable info on parsing the auction from your proofreading. 4C was partly kidding, and partly sacrifice. For I do doubt robot could understand 1C-2NT overbidding, and how it goes further, so I quit. I was trying to rebid diamond to give my pard robot an identical figure of my hand....

The focus is on 4S. Is 4D-4S a form of splinter? Ok..a new info for me:)

today [hv=sn=me&s=SQT65HK85DTCKJT84&wn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&w=SA32HT42DAJ5CQ752&nn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&n=S74H9763D8764CA63&en=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&e=SKJ98HAQJDKQ932C9&d=n&v=o&b=1&a=P1D(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)P2N(Balanced%20invite%20--%202-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-3%20H%3B%202-3%20S%3B%2011-12%20HCP%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20C%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20H%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20S)P3S(New%20suit%20--%205+%20D%3B%204+%20S%3B%2021-%20HCP%3B%2014-22%20total%20points)P3N(2-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-3%20H%3B%202-3%20S%3B%2011-12%20HCP%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20C%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20H%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20S)PP4C(4+%20C%3B%2016+%20HCP%3B%2016-%20total%20points%3B%2010+%20rel)4S(2-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-3%20H%3B%203%20S%3B%2011-12%20HCP%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20C%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20H%3B%20partial%20stop%20in%20S)PPP&p=S5S2S7S9DKDTDJD8C9CKC2C3S6S3S4S8SJSTSAH9HTH7HQHKCJC5C6D3C4CQCAD2D4DQSQD5CTC7H3SKD9C8DAD6H4H6HAH5HJH8H2D7]499|370[/hv] ;and yesterday [hv=sn=me&s=SJHAQ985DAKJ52CT5&wn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&w=SK63H6D7643CKQJ82&nn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&n=SQT875HT732DQT9C9&en=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&e=SA942HKJ4D8CA7643&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=P1C(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)1H(One-level%20overcall%20--%205+%20H%3B%208-17%20HCP%3B%209-)2H(Cue%3A%20limit%20raise%20or%20better%20--%204+%20C%3B%2011+%20total%20points)P2N(3+%20C%3B%2011-14%20HCP%3B%2012+%20total%20points%3B%20stop%20in%20H)3D(4+%20D%3B%205+%20H%3B%2017-%20HCP%3B%2018-19%20total%20points)P3H(2+%20H%3B%206-%20total%20points)3S(4%20C%3B%204+%20S%3B%2014-%20HCP%3B%2014+%20total%20points%3B%20stop%20in%20H)4D(17%20HCP%3B%20twice%20rebiddable%20D%3B%20twice%20rebidd)4S(4+%20C%3B%204+%20S%3B%2011-16%20total%20points)D(2+%20H%3B%206%20total%20points)PPP&p=DAD6D9D8SJSKS5S2H6H3HJHQDKD3DTS4CAC5C2C9SAD2S6S7H4H5S3H7D4DQS9D5C6CTC8HTDJD7H2C7HACJSQHKSTC3H8CQS8C4H9CK]499|370[/hv]

Thank you！ It makes sense at first glance. Only if robots had not set their goal as to win scores, they can randomly discard instead of trump.

[hv=sn=2bull&s=SQ53HT95DK9CKT982&wn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&w=ST96HQJ2DAQT43CJ4&nn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&n=SA72H8743DJ82CQ76&en=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&e=SKJ84HAK6D765CA53&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=1N(notrump%20opener.%20Could%20have%205M.%20--%202-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-5%20H%3B%202-5%20S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20points)P3N(2-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-4%20H%3B%202-4%20S%3B%2010-13%20total%20points)PPP&p=CTCJCQC3SAS4S3S6S2SKS5S9HAH5H2H8HKH9HJH4D6D9DTDJS7SJSQSTCKC4C6CAS8C2D3D2D7DKDAD8D4H7D5C8H6HTHQH3DQC7C5C9]499|350[/hv] [hv=sn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&s=SQ53HT95DK9CKT982&wn=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&w=ST96HQJ2DAQT43CJ4&nn=kaybeck19&n=SA72H8743DJ82CQ76&en=%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E4%BA%BA&e=SKJ84HAK6D765CA53&d=e&v=n&b=34&a=1N(notrump%20opener.%20Could%20have%205M.%20--%202-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-5%20H%3B%202-5%20S%3B%2015-17%20HCP%3B%2018-%20tot)P3N(2-5%20C%3B%202-5%20D%3B%202-4%20H%3B%202-4%20S%3B%2010-13%20total%20points)PPP&p=CTCJCQC5C7C3C2C4C6CACKD3HAH5HJH3D5DKDAD2S6S2S8SQC9D4S7S4C8S9H4D6H9HQH7H6STSASKS5H8HKHTH2SJS3DTD8D7D9DQDJ]499|350[/hv]

测试： [hv=sn=plant88888&s=SQ98732HKQJ7DQCK4&wn=机器人&w=SAH962DA432CT9872&nn=机器人&n=SK4HAT8DT8CAQJ653&en=机器人&e=SJT65H543DKJ9765C&d=n&v=n&b=21&a=1C(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20C%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points)2D(Aggressive%20weak%20jump%20overcall%20--%206+%20D%3B%209-%20HCP%3B%203+%20total%20points)2S(Free%20bid%20--%205+%20S%3B%2011+%20total%20points)4D(The%20Law%3A%2010%20trump%20->%20game%20support%20--%202+%20D)4S(3+%20C%3B%203+%20S%3B%2014-19%20total%20points)PPP&p=CTC3D7CKS2SAS4S6C7CJSTC4DKDQDAD8H9HAH3H7SKS5S3D2C6SJSQC2S9H2H8D9S8D3HTD6S7C8CQH5HJH6C5H4HQC9CAD5HKD4DTDJ]499|350[/hv] 哇~~~成功！谢楼主详细准确的文档！

收到！多谢！您太谦虚了！

Thank you,it seems true. The only reason I could guess was the design of randomness.

感谢您的帮助！以后有机器人的问题，知道去那边看看啦！ 作为新人，请前辈多关照！

不明白这种“不公平”是为什么： 我这桌，机器人懂得将吃就能宕。 另一桌，机器人知道先不将吃，让人家做成。

发现另一桌，机器人的首攻和我一样，对面（北家）是活人，能理解C10的首功。 我经常遇到这种机器人的不平等待遇！！！保证是完全相同的叫牌过程和首攻，机器人的反应不一样。

谢谢楼上，学到了！ 另，机器人的约定在哪里能看到？很想学习！

上两个链接能看到吗？我还不会发图片哦

我的首攻，机器人让我很崩溃 某专家的首功，得到机器人的完美的配合 虽然机器人貌似不懂梅花10，但是它自己也这么攻！——咱们人懂 请问这是什么约定？能给个文档链接吗？

谢谢分享！学习鸟~~长姿势鸟~~