Jump to content

cargobeep

Full Members
  • Posts

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

cargobeep's Achievements

(3/13)

8

Reputation

  1. If you don't play penalty doubles of 1NT, you WILL get slaughtered. I'll on occasion start opening 12-14 HCP NTs, and you'll be left guessing whether to take it out. I'll even snooker you with my 6-card ♠ suit if I feel like it in 1NTxx. Not a workable system in my opinion. I would not condemn partner for passing or going to 2♦. With at least 21 HCP and the lead, the opponents ARE likely to go down. If partner did have a maximum, things could get very ugly for N/S
  2. ^ Because if the cards are not in your favor, you can either A: Play the Spades and go down 1. B: Try the other suits and risk going down 2 or more. The decision at IMPS is obvious, but the decision at MPS is not quite as obvious.
  3. When I meant early on, I meant third trick, not halfway through the hand! <_< Yes, your play will work, but it's extremely obvious. And also highly unlikely, given that East would need to have passed a hand with 7+ diamonds AND a void.
  4. ^ Cashing the A♦ early on is as far as I know is useless. Give me a layout where it's superior or else shush. Basically, this hand is autopilot. You either always fail or you always win.
  5. ^ Example hands please where your play is superior.
  6. ^ Your line doesn't work. In fact, with the several lines I've tested double-dummy, you're either 1) screwed after playing the K♠ (the pitches are all extremely obvious, no way to make a mistake). 2) able to simply cash your high cards until either the J♣ or J♥ falls, which as far as I know, will on any makeable layout. This is likely since the 2D/3D preempt never happened. Some layouts do require a squeeze, but those are pretty well automatic on this hand I think it's time to see the original hand.
  7. Lead low and hope they can't cash 9 off the top.
  8. Need more information to make an informed decision. Mainly: 1) What got thrown off? 2) Is this IMPS or MPS?
  9. ^ But it's not standard. So seems to me it's a bit of a blip in the SAYC train. <_<
  10. ^ Is that standard? Because I'm having trouble finding anything about this
  11. ^ Well then O wise one, what do you suggest? You can try Blackwood, but even with 2 Aces, you're still more or less guessing if 6x will make. And with one Ace, you don't have a clue what to do next. The only thing making 4S natural wins is if S is psyching or the distribution in Spades is at least 6-6. And if it was 6-6, why would E need/want to consult partner?
  12. [hv=pc=n&s=skjt983h765d9cqt3&w=sa42ha92d86543c82&n=s76hjt843dt72cj76&e=sq5hkqdakqjcak954&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=2sppdp3dp4sppp]399|300[/hv]
  13. [hv=pc=n&s=sjt98742hkdj5ca82&n=sk53hqj863dt7cj65&d=n&v=b&b=13&a=pp1sd2s3d4sppp]266|200[/hv] SAYC/IMPS. Do you agree with the bidding by N/S? Was 4S a good call?
×
×
  • Create New...