Jump to content

1axbycz1

Members
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1axbycz1

  1. http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?bbo=y&lin=pn%7C1axbycz1%2CRobot%2CRobot%2CRobot%7Cst%7C%7Cmd%7C3S952HK2DJT964C632%2CSK63H97DAQ73CAK97%2CS84HAQJT8654DK8C8%2CSAQJT7H3D52CQJT54%7Csv%7CE%7Cah%7CBoard%209%7Cmb%7C4H%7Can%7CPreempt%20--%207%2B%20%21H%3B%2011-%20HCP%3B%203%2B%20total%20points%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CD%7Can%7CTakeout%20double%20--%203-5%20%21C%3B%203-5%20%21D%3B%202-%20%21H%3B%203-4%20%21S%3B%2015%2B%20total%20points%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7C5H%7Can%7C11%2B%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cmb%7CP%7Cpc%7CHK%7Cpc%7CH7%7Cpc%7CH8%7Cpc%7CH3%7Cpc%7CH2%7Cpc%7CH9%7Cpc%7CHA%7Cpc%7CC5%7Cpc%7CS8%7Cpc%7CS7%7Cpc%7CS2%7Cpc%7CSK%7Cpc%7CC9%7Cpc%7CC8%7Cpc%7CC4%7Cpc%7CC2%7Cpc%7CC7%7Cpc%7CHT%7Cpc%7CCT%7Cpc%7CC3%7Cpc%7CS4%7Cpc%7CSA%7Cpc%7CS5%7Cpc%7CS6%7Cpc%7CCQ%7Cpc%7CC6%7Cpc%7CCA%7Cpc%7CD8%7Cpc%7CS3%7Cpc%7CDK%7Cpc%7CST%7Cpc%7CS9%7Cpc%7CD2%7Cpc%7CD9%7Cpc%7CDA%7Cpc%7CHJ%7Cpc%7CHQ%7Cpc%7CD5%7Cpc%7CD4%7Cpc%7CD7%7Cpc%7CH4%7Cpc%7CCJ%7Cpc%7CD6%7Cpc%7CD3%7Cpc%7CH6%7Cpc%7CSJ%7Cpc%7CDT%7Cpc%7CDQ%7Cpc%7CH5%7Cpc%7CSQ%7Cpc%7CDJ%7Cpc%7CCK%7C The bidding speaks for itself.
  2. Can you explain how you get the entries to ruff spades?
  3. [hv=pc=n&s=sk742hkq74d92cj74&n=sthaj85dak8643cqt&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1dp1hp3hp4hppp]266|200[/hv] IMPs scoring. W leads ♣A, then ♠A, then a small ♣ to East's king. After that a low ♠ is returned. (I was playing with 3 robots, if that matters.) My plan: rise K, play 2 rounds of diamonds and ruff a third round hoping to establish the suit. This plan works if: 1. W has 3 diamonds and E has 2, trumps not 5-0, or 2. W has 2 diamonds and E has 3, in which the 3rd round must be ruffed high. so this needs trumps 3-2 Anyone has a better line?
  4. One more comment I have about hand 1: After I pull 2 rounds of trump, playing the ♠Q is pretty much playing for the ♣A to be with W. If you want to play for the ♣A to be with E, you should pull all the trumps and then play ♠Q. So yes, after the second round of trump, you're forced to guess who has the ♣A.
  5. Hand 2 seems a lot more tricky than hand 1. This is my (probably futile) attempt: If W has a singleton ♣ that isn't the K there's a good chance he'll lead it, so I assume otherwise. I win trick 1 in dummy and play a low club to the Q. Case 1: the finesse wins. I assume the ♣K is onside. (If a highly skilled defender knows how to hold up I'll concede.) Now take a trump finesse. If it's onside you tend to make +1 most of the time quite easily. If it's offside: -If a spade is returned, win A and ruff the losing spade in dummy, cash all top trumps in dummy, then take the clubs finesse again. -If a club is returned, take the finesse, pull trumps, you get your 10 tricks -If a diamond is returned, I'll duck (though I don't think it really matters). Can always win the 3rd round of diamond and then pull trumps. So when the ♣ finesse works you usually make.... Case 2: the finesse loses. Once I get on lead I cash ♥A and play a ♦ to K. If that loses I can only hope that the trump Q is onside. If it wins I now play a trump from hand, taking a finesse this time. If this finesse loses I'll have to ruff a ♠ high and pull the trumps, then cashing the ♣ to make. Conclusion: among the 3 things, ♣K, ♦A, ♥Q, if one of them is onside I make most of the time, but if all are off I lose. Anyone has a better line?
  6. Hand 1: First count tricks. We have 4 hearts and 5 diamonds, for a total of 9 top tricks. The 10th trick can come from knocking out ♠A or if the ♣A is onside. However, there is the threat of risking a ♦ ruff, the lead looks like a singleton. Taking this into account, I would play this way: After winning the first diamond trick, I cash ♥A and then ♥J. If trumps are 3-2 simply pull all the trumps and then play a ♠. If E discards on the second round of trump, I switch to the ♠Q immediately. If E wins and plays a small ♣, well this is where it gets tricky. I'll take a bet that the ♣A is with W, and duck. If W wins with the ♣Q (or J), and he holds the ♣A, then there is nothing he can do except to cash the A and there is no way he can get his ruff. However, if E holds the ♣A then another club would put the lead back to E and then he can get a ruff. Indeed, if E holds the ♣A, he could have done something different: play a ♦ to give W a ruff, and then get in on the ♣A to give W another ruff. So I assume that by switching the ♣, he doesn't have the A (is that sound?). I would think this hand is really about who you think has the ♣A. Just my try on the hand.
  7. I feel that pass is an interesting option. One advantage is that opponents may stop in 4♦ when 5♦ is making. Bidding tends to push them higher.
  8. [hv=pc=n&s=sq86h76d85cajt943&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=2h(11-15%2C%20%5B43%5D15%20or%204414%20or%204405)3d]133|200[/hv] The 2h opener shows a 11-15, and a 3-suiter short in diamonds(4315, 3415, 4414 or 4405). I know that each side has a 10-card fit. Now what? Partner will seldom act in this auction since I know much more about his hand than he knows about mine. Edit: Anyone going for pass or 3nt? Edit 2: This is IMPs scoring, if it matters.
  9. Ah, yes. I know, the primary purpose of having a trump suit is to act as a stopper. And the stopper is only effective if we can ruff. I need to consider ruffing value as well. 4333 and 4333 belong into NTs and not the 8 card fit, right?
  10. As a beginner, one of the first few rules I learnt is that 4M works better than 3N in the presence of an 8-card fit or better. However, as I gain experience, I realise that quite often, that only 9 tricks are available whether I play in major or NTs. Or worse still, sometimes I can only make 8 in a trump contract but 9 in NT. My question here: How to identify such situations? What is the general type of hand for this? I have identified one type; where the bidding shows that the opps have unbalanced hands and they are likely to take an early defensive ruff. What else?
  11. I presume this is a short club, this may be a large part of your issue here in recognising the double fit, but what would 3♣ show over 2♠ by your methods ? I use that as long suit trial bid. As for my minor suit openings, 1m promises 3, 1♣ with 3-3, 1♦ with 4-4 or 5-5, else longer minor.
  12. true. i didnt bid the 2♠, my partner did. anyway, if N really bid 3♠, S is most likely to make a game raise, with the same result.
  13. [hv=pc=n&s=skqj8h762d87caj63&w=s974hk94dkjt65c84&n=sat32hajd2ckqt952&e=s65hqt853daq943c7&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=1cp1sp2sp3sp4sppp]399|300[/hv] At some tables E overcalled in ♦, some used michaels to show the red 2-suiter. Sitting south, I played the hand for +480. 4S+2=480 at 5 tables, 5Dx-2=500 at the other 1 table. Nobody bid the slam. N/S had 25 points in total but the slam is cold. Why? Is is because of the double fit? I evaluated my hand as simply invitational here. N is a minimum opener. So now, how to bid the hand a) if the opps simply pass throughout B) if the opps compete in ♦
  14. Yes, I have learnt about those hand evaluation methods. I also learnt about trial bids (both long and short) to determine which are the relavant honors and which are not. KJxx opposite a void is hardly worth anything, and is sometimes no better than xxxx.
  15. Wait, so 3♦ is an artifical bid and says nothing about the suit? And what if S accepts the invitation and replies in 4♥? What do you bid? "4-card support and 2 aces is always a Limit Raise for me." I want to clarify what you mean here. Do you make a limit raise here in competition or do you still make the limit raise when RHO passes?
  16. So this shows an invitational hand, while 3♥ is simply competitive?
  17. "#Q2 If 5C comes to South, South should not X, he has xxxx in trumps, his trump length (without any ruffing values) is useless, the length gurantees 2nd round control of clubs - even xxx would gurantee this, they have 9 trumps, you have 3, how many has opener?" South can lead trump whenever he is on lead to reduce their ruffing value; holding the pointed aces doesnt make it too hard to gain the lead. I dont really see the problem of the penalty X over 5♣. "#Q3 South will show an Ace not being the Ace of clubs => 6H, if South has AKxx in clubs, he will show 0 Aces". What I was trying to mean here is that 5♥ probably fails. No dummy entries if they lead trump. If S has Axx xxx xxx Qxxx does the small slam make? I see 2 ♦ losers. #d competitive, not invitational. Then what can I use as invitational? #f matter of agreement, to play will be the most common agreement why play 3nt when holding the major? What do you exactly mean by in between raises?
  18. This is what I understand about competitive auctions with both sides holding a fit. 1. The single raise has the same meaning as it would without the overcall. 6-9 points. 2. There are 3 main types for the opener to show: competitive, invitational, and game-going. Holding a slam like this is rare. 3. Opener's main aim is to find out how much of responder's values is wasted in clubs. Give responder xxx xxx xxx AKxx and while a single raise is still suitable, game might not even make if the opps lead trump and trump splits 3-1 or 4-0. And now, what does the following show? a. Dbl, penalty? b. Pass, not willing to compete further? c. new suit. shows a second suit? cuebid? d. 3♥ is competitive/invitational for me. is that practical? e. 4♥ is obviously a sign-off. may be pre-emptive. f. What is 3nt? to play? Is 4♣ a cuebid, or does it ask for a cuebid? What does this mean exactly? Shortness? If north bids 4♣ and east comes with 5♣, south would probably X for penalty. now as north, do you sit for 5♣x or pull to 5♥ (which partner will probably pass). "5♣ exclusion keycard." Then E will pass, now what to do if S shows 1 pointed ace? Do you bid 6♥? As mentioned above, what if responder has xxx xxx xxx AKxx? And let's say you manage to bid the grand. After a ♣ opening lead, you ruff trick 1, and play the ♥A on trick 2, revealing a 3-0 trump break, 3 with east. How to play ♦ for no losers? Who to play for the queen?
  19. [hv=pc=n&s=sa63ht752da4c8632&n=sk2hakq964dkjt63c&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1h2c2h3c]266|200[/hv] What do I bid here?
  20. card symbols? use ! and the first letter of the suit !c=♣ !d=♦ !h=♥ !s=♠ There is also !n to show NT in a special font.
  21. Well, currently I use some truscot-like defense against strong club. p = showing some strength. X = black suits 1♦=pointed suits 1♥=majors 1♠=garbage hand, not suitable for anything else 1N=rounded suits 2♣=minors 2♦=red suits 2M=weak 2 in the suit bid, reasonalbe suit or else 1♠. 2N=extreme 2-suiter 3-level and higher shows single-suiters with reasonable suits. follow rule of 2 and 3. I normally only use X, 1♦ and 1♥ with good suits (normally 5-5), otherwise I simply bid 1♠. With a weak-2 in a minor suit I bid 1♠ too. So, my 1♠ does not reveal any hand shape. I just hope I dont get doubled in 1♠, though that is unlikely. Most strong club players do not try to X when the opps overcall 1♠ or 1N. Even if they do, I use 1N to show a balanced hand, and simply asks partner to bid his best suit. There is a chance that this doesnt work, but that is highly unlikely. With 3-suiters I choose my 2 best suits. I do these following the 2 main principles of defending against strong club. 1. Once I reach the 2-level, I have essentially neutralized their system advantages. I seldom bid at the 3-level. 2. I have to bid at least 1♠ to be able to take away any space from the opps. X gives them 2 step, 1♦ gives 1, 1♥ does not give or take, but I need to bear in mind they have a cue-bid. Think my 1♠ bid fits well into these objectives, since it does not show any distribution and they have no cues. Need some comments on the weaknesses of these. I am aware that the responder has cuebids, since I have shown my suits precisely. Anything else? Now back to the topic. Does this work against strong pass? Use pass as strong, and now 1♣ to be the same as my X above? But now, since they open with a pass, 1♣ takes up 1 bid, 1♦ does not give or take, 1♥ takes away 1 step, and 1♠ would take away 2. Then should I adjust my "fert" overcall to 1♥? Or can I just leave it at 1♠? For the exact opposite reasons, I find my defense to strong club failing against strong diamond ones, since 1♠ overcalls are nowhere as effective. With those I just pass with weak hands. Use 1♠ to show something stronger. Now calling 1N is more dangerous as 1♠ since I normally make use of 1N to ask partner to bid his best suit to avoid playing in a 4-2 misfit.
  22. "If they 'open' a pass bid as much as you can as fast as you can." Something like defending against strong club systems like precision?
  23. Alright, I was just asking if I needed one. Since your answer is a clear "no", then I wont continue this topic.
×
×
  • Create New...