I agree with the first double. While I play 2N as two suited, I don’t understand why I’d bid 2N here….one of my suits is hearts and the last time I checked partner could bid 2H over double but not over 2N. If we’re in trouble, as we may well be, I’m all for getting doubled in 2H rather than 3H! As for the second double, I empathize given that we’re at favourable and we may well be able to compete in 3C or 3H, but I do think that sometimes discretion is the better part of valour. Would I have succumbed to the temptation? Probably not but I’m widely regarded as too conservative by my peers. I’m pretty sure that at least one of my two regular partners would double again, or at the very least desperately want to Not at imps….never at imps….but at mps, letting them play 2S on this kind of hand is more often losing bridge than it is winning bridge. And one disaster doesn’t mean much, if this style generates two good boards for very bad one, which t tends to do. At imps, however, the size of the disaster matters, and it could be large. Btw,I think that this problem would garner somewhat more reliable answers if presented solely from north’s point of view…few posters would openly admit to taking an action that we can all see is doomed! Finally, btw, passing the double is appalling. Partner asked us to bid either clubs or hearts. We have three clubs! Bid 3C.