Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/26/2019 in all areas
-
Law 20 is of absolutely no interest as far as the cards actually held by a player is concerned. It concerns what is the actual agreement with the meaning of a call. So an explanation is mistaken even when it accurately describes the hand held by the explainer's partner if the actual agreement is different or there is no agreement.1 point
-
I also don't know what 2NT means without discussion. It seems to me that if you have an (any) agreement (except natural) it would be alertable since it would be some conventional meaning.1 point
-
If you thought you can make 2NT surely you would simply double 1NT and get more points.Having 2N as minors/scrambling/Lebensohl makes sense I have no idea what is standard Having 2N be alertable is just silly.1 point
-
I don't, but I almost do. More points than an absolute minimum, semi-solid spades, a liberal dose of of 9 and 10, a singleton. Offset partially by wasted honours in the minors, but still worth looking hard at before passing I think.1 point